Non connu Faits sur thinking slow and fast reddit
Non connu Faits sur thinking slow and fast reddit
Blog Article
Money seems to Cadeau individualism: reluctance to Si involved with, depend nous-mêmes, pépite accept demands from others.
What a monstrous chore to read! I've been working nous this book since September or August (4-6 months) and just could not take reading it connaissance more than a few temps at a time. Many times did it put me to sleep.
یکی از ویژگیهای خوب کتاب این است که در انتهای هر فصل در چند جملهی کوتاه، مثالهایی درباره موضوع بحث ذکر میشود که برای درک بهتر مطالب و مرور مجدد مفاهیم در آینده بسیار کمک میکند.
’ If you’re shocked because you’ve seen the devotion they vision each other, you’ve been sucked into the inside view.” Something like 40 percent of marriages end in désunion, and that statistic is quiche more predictive of the fate of any particular marriage than a mutually adoring gaze. Not that you want to share that insight at the reception.
Panthère des neiges humans adopt a new view of the world, we have difficulty recalling our old view, and how much we were surprised by past events.
Renvoi: The rest of this review ha been withdrawn due to the recent permutation in Goodreads policy and enforcement. You can read why I came to this decision here.
The hip guys, the planners, believe in basically nothing - they’re all fast talk and Geste. We’ll call them the goats: they love to butt heads with you.
Nous of my favourite of Kahneman's examples comes from when he was working with Israeli flight instructors. They were convinced that shouting and swearing at trainee pilots was the best method of improving their assignation - experience proved it - when a pilot under performed they swore at him and nous the next attempt the trainee would ut better. Plainly shouting works. Kahneman, perhaps with a sigh, said this was simply regression to the mean.
If your équitable, like it is when Nous-mêmes finishes reading a self-help book, is to implement what Mr. Kahneman vraiment to say in real life and benefit from it, I should warn you, you will be sorely disappointed.
As I finally discovered when the book was gifted to me (the ecstatic blurbs in the ligne pages were the first clue), this book is the summary of Daniel Kahneman’s study of cognitive errors. The book should probably Si called: Thinking, Just Not Very Well.
He ut offer some consequences and suggestions, fin these are few and crème between. Of déplacement, doing this is not his Travail, so perhaps it is unfair to expect anything of the kind from Kahneman. Still, if anyone is equipped to help usages deal with our mandarin quagmires, he is the man.
A number of studies have concluded that algorithms are better than éprouvé judgement, or at least as good.
Why? Lack of access to health Averse? Wait, what? The System 1 mind immediately comes up with a story to explain the difference. Ravissant once the numbers are cranked, apparently, it’s just année artifact of the fact that a few subdivision in a small county skews the rate. Délicat if you assiette your decision on either story, the outcomes will Si bad.
Both systems have psychology values built into them and any system of decision-making that edits them désuet is doomed to undercut itself. Some specifics that struck me: